Reasons to choose DC200
Released in 1998, DC200 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak DC200
vs Kodak DC210 plus
VS
Sensor area
40 mm²
DC20040 mm²
DC210 plus- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC200 and DC210 plus have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC200MetricDC210 plus
0.9 MPEffective pixels0.9 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.64 µmPixel pitch6.64 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area44.1 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density2.27 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight400 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC200 and DC210 plus have the same sensor area. The DC200 and DC210 plus have the same body weight. The DC200 and DC210 plus have the same effective resolution. The DC200 and DC210 plus were both released in 1998. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC210 plus
Released in 1998, DC210 plus has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.