CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DC200 plus
vs Kodak DC280

Archive illustration for Kodak DC200 plus

Kodak / 1999

DC200 plus

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak DC280

Kodak / 1999

DC280

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

40 mm²
DC200 plus
42 mm²
DC280
Area ratio
1.07:1
Absolute difference
3 mm²
Relative difference
7%

The DC280 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC200 plusMetricDC280
0.9 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.53 × 5.64
6.64 µmPixel pitch4.61 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area21.23 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density4.71 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight420 g
Compact FlashStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries included

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC280 has the larger sensor area. The DC200 plus has the lighter body. The DC280 has the higher effective resolution. The DC200 plus and DC280 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC200 plus

Released in 1999, DC200 plus has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC280

Released in 1999, DC280 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras