CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak DC200 plus
vs Kodak DC240

Archive illustration for Kodak DC200 plus

Kodak / 1999

DC200 plus

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak DC240

Kodak / 1999

DC240

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

40 mm²
DC200 plus
40 mm²
DC240
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC200 plus and DC240 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC200 plusMetricDC240
0.9 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
7.27 × 5.46Sensor7.27 × 5.46
6.64 µmPixel pitch5.75 µm
44.1 µm²Pixel area33.08 µm²
2.27 MP/cm²Pixel density3.02 MP/cm²
4.76Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
400 gWeight420 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries included

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC200 plus and DC240 have the same sensor area. The DC200 plus has the lighter body. The DC240 has the higher effective resolution. The DC200 plus and DC240 were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC200 plus

Released in 1999, DC200 plus has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 0.9 MP effective resolution, and a 400 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC240

Released in 1999, DC240 has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras