CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

JVC GC-QX3HD
vs Samsung Digimax V3

Archive illustration for JVC GC-QX3HD

JVC / 2001

GC-QX3HD

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax V3

Samsung / 2003

Digimax V3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
GC-QX3HD
38 mm²
Digimax V3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The GC-QX3HD and Digimax V3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

GC-QX3HDMetricDigimax V3
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.37 µmPixel pitch3.37 µm
11.35 µm²Pixel area11.35 µm²
8.81 MP/cm²Pixel density8.81 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
290 gWeight165 g
SmartMediaStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA, Li-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The GC-QX3HD and Digimax V3 have the same sensor area. The Digimax V3 has the lighter body. The GC-QX3HD and Digimax V3 have the same effective resolution. The Digimax V3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose GC-QX3HD

Released in 2001, GC-QX3HD has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 290 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax V3

Released in 2003, Digimax V3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras