CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD C 1.3 SD
vs Olympus C-2040 Zoom

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD C 1.3 SD

Jenoptik / 2002

JD C 1.3 SD

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-2040 Zoom

Olympus / 2000

C-2040 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
JD C 1.3 SD
31 mm²
C-2040 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD C 1.3 SD and C-2040 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

JD C 1.3 SDMetricC-2040 Zoom
1.3 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.02 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area16.17 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density6.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
80 gWeight420 g
Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
3x AAABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD C 1.3 SD and C-2040 Zoom have the same sensor area. The JD C 1.3 SD has the lighter body. The C-2040 Zoom has the higher effective resolution. The JD C 1.3 SD is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD C 1.3 SD

Released in 2002, JD C 1.3 SD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 80 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-2040 Zoom

Released in 2000, C-2040 Zoom has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras