CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD C 1.3 LCD
vs Olympus C-2100 UZ

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD C 1.3 LCD

Jenoptik / 2002

JD C 1.3 LCD

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-2100 UZ

Olympus / 2000

C-2100 UZ

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
JD C 1.3 LCD
31 mm²
C-2100 UZ
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD C 1.3 LCD and C-2100 UZ have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

JD C 1.3 LCDMetricC-2100 UZ
1.3 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch4.02 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area16.17 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density6.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight635 g
Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
4x AAABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD C 1.3 LCD and C-2100 UZ have the same sensor area. The JD C 1.3 LCD has the lighter body. The C-2100 UZ has the higher effective resolution. The JD C 1.3 LCD is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD C 1.3 LCD

Released in 2002, JD C 1.3 LCD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-2100 UZ

Released in 2000, C-2100 UZ has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 635 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras