CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 8.0z3 EasyShot
vs Samsung Digimax L85

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Jenoptik / 2008

JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax L85

Samsung / 2006

Digimax L85

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 8.0z3 EasyShot
38 mm²
Digimax L85
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot and Digimax L85 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

JD 8.0z3 EasyShotMetricDigimax L85
8 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.16 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area4.68 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density21.37 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight—
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot and Digimax L85 have the same sensor area. The Digimax L85 has the lighter body. The Digimax L85 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 8.0z3 EasyShot is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 8.0z3 EasyShot

Released in 2008, JD 8.0z3 EasyShot has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax L85

Released in 2006, Digimax L85 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras