CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 8.0 exclusiv
vs Minox DC 9011 WP

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 8.0 exclusiv

Jenoptik / 2008

JD 8.0 exclusiv

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DC 9011 WP

Minox / 2010

DC 9011 WP

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 8.0 exclusiv
28 mm²
DC 9011 WP
Area ratio
1.33:1
Absolute difference
9 mm²
Relative difference
33.2%

The JD 8.0 exclusiv has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

JD 8.0 exclusivMetricDC 9011 WP
8 MPEffective pixels9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.16 × 4.62
2.18 µmPixel pitch1.78 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area3.16 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density31.62 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight119 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 8.0 exclusiv has the larger sensor area. The DC 9011 WP has the lighter body. The DC 9011 WP has the higher effective resolution. The DC 9011 WP is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 8.0 exclusiv

Released in 2008, JD 8.0 exclusiv has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC 9011 WP

Released in 2010, DC 9011 WP has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 9 MP effective resolution, and a 119 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras