CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 5.0z3 EasyShot
vs Jenoptik JD 5.2 zoom

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 5.0z3 EasyShot

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 5.0z3 EasyShot

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 5.2 zoom

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 5.2 zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
JD 5.0z3 EasyShot
25 mm²
JD 5.2 zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 5.0z3 EasyShot and JD 5.2 zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 5.0z3 EasyShotMetricJD 5.2 zoom
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 5.0z3 EasyShot and JD 5.2 zoom have the same sensor area. The JD 5.0z3 EasyShot has the lighter body. The JD 5.0z3 EasyShot and JD 5.2 zoom have the same effective resolution. The JD 5.0z3 EasyShot and JD 5.2 zoom were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 5.0z3 EasyShot

Released in 2004, JD 5.0z3 EasyShot has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 5.2 zoom

Released in 2004, JD 5.2 zoom has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras