CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 4360z
vs Sanyo VPC MZ2

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4360z

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 4360z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sanyo VPC MZ2

Sanyo / 2002

VPC MZ2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 4360z
38 mm²
VPC MZ2
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 4360z and VPC MZ2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

JD 4360zMetricVPC MZ2
4 MPEffective pixels2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch4.35 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area18.95 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density5.28 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight280 g
Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 4360z and VPC MZ2 have the same sensor area. The JD 4360z has the lighter body. The JD 4360z has the higher effective resolution. The JD 4360z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 4360z

Released in 2004, JD 4360z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose VPC MZ2

Released in 2002, VPC MZ2 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras