CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 4360z
vs Jenoptik JD 4363z

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4360z

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 4360z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4363z

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 4363z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 4360z
38 mm²
JD 4363z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 4360z and JD 4363z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 4360zMetricJD 4363z
4 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight160 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 4360z and JD 4363z have the same sensor area. The JD 4360z and JD 4363z have the same body weight. The JD 4360z and JD 4363z have the same effective resolution. The JD 4360z and JD 4363z were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 4360z

Released in 2004, JD 4360z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 4363z

Released in 2004, JD 4363z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras