CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 4100 zoom
vs Jenoptik JD 6.0 z3

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4100 zoom

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 4100 zoom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 6.0 z3

Jenoptik / 2004

JD 6.0 z3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 4100 zoom
38 mm²
JD 6.0 z3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 4100 zoom and JD 6.0 z3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 4100 zoomMetricJD 6.0 z3
4.13 MPEffective pixels6.37 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.03 µmPixel pitch2.44 µm
9.18 µm²Pixel area5.95 µm²
10.9 MP/cm²Pixel density16.81 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight200 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 4100 zoom and JD 6.0 z3 have the same sensor area. The JD 4100 zoom has the lighter body. The JD 6.0 z3 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 4100 zoom and JD 6.0 z3 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 4100 zoom

Released in 2004, JD 4100 zoom has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 6.0 z3

Released in 2004, JD 6.0 z3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.37 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras