CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 4100 z3 S
vs Jenoptik JD 5200 z3

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4100 z3 S

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 4100 z3 S

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 5200 z3

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 5200 z3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 4100 z3 S
38 mm²
JD 5200 z3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 4100 z3 S and JD 5200 z3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 4100 z3 SMetricJD 5200 z3
4 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.08 µmPixel pitch2.7 µm
9.47 µm²Pixel area7.29 µm²
10.56 MP/cm²Pixel density13.72 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
370 gWeight280 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 4100 z3 S and JD 5200 z3 have the same sensor area. The JD 5200 z3 has the lighter body. The JD 5200 z3 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 4100 z3 S and JD 5200 z3 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 4100 z3 S

Released in 2002, JD 4100 z3 S has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 370 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 5200 z3

Released in 2002, JD 5200 z3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras