CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 3300 z3
vs Jenoptik JD 4100 z3 S

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 3300 z3

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 3300 z3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4100 z3 S

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 4100 z3 S

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 3300 z3
38 mm²
JD 4100 z3 S
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 3300 z3 and JD 4100 z3 S have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 3300 z3MetricJD 4100 z3 S
3.25 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.41 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
11.66 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
8.58 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight370 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 3300 z3 and JD 4100 z3 S have the same sensor area. The JD 3300 z3 has the lighter body. The JD 4100 z3 S has the higher effective resolution. The JD 3300 z3 and JD 4100 z3 S were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 3300 z3

Released in 2002, JD 3300 z3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.25 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 4100 z3 S

Released in 2002, JD 4100 z3 S has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 370 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras