CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 3300 z3
vs Jenoptik JD 4100 z3

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 3300 z3

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 3300 z3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 4100 z3

Jenoptik / 2001

JD 4100 z3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
JD 3300 z3
42 mm²
JD 4100 z3
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The JD 4100 z3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

JD 3300 z3MetricJD 4100 z3
3.25 MPEffective pixels4.13 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.53 × 5.64
3.41 µmPixel pitch3.21 µm
11.66 µm²Pixel area10.28 µm²
8.58 MP/cm²Pixel density9.72 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight280 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 4100 z3 has the larger sensor area. The JD 3300 z3 and JD 4100 z3 have the same body weight. The JD 4100 z3 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 3300 z3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 3300 z3

Released in 2002, JD 3300 z3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.25 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 4100 z3

Released in 2001, JD 4100 z3 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras