Reasons to choose JD 3.1 exclusiv
Released in 2005, JD 3.1 exclusiv has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 3.1 exclusiv
vs Jenoptik JD C 3.1 SL
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
JD 3.1 exclusiv31 mm²
JD C 3.1 SL- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 3.1 exclusiv and JD C 3.1 SL have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
JD 3.1 exclusivMetricJD C 3.1 SL
3.1 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.15 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
9.91 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
10.09 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 3.1 exclusiv and JD C 3.1 SL have the same sensor area. The JD C 3.1 SL has the lighter body. The JD C 3.1 SL has the higher effective resolution. The JD 3.1 exclusiv and JD C 3.1 SL were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD C 3.1 SL
Released in 2005, JD C 3.1 SL has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.