CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Jenoptik JD 2100 M
vs Jenoptik JD 2100 z3 S

Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 2100 M

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 2100 M

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Jenoptik JD 2100 z3 S

Jenoptik / 2002

JD 2100 z3 S

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
JD 2100 M
21 mm²
JD 2100 z3 S
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The JD 2100 M and JD 2100 z3 S have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

JD 2100 MMetricJD 2100 z3 S
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
256 gWeight330 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The JD 2100 M and JD 2100 z3 S have the same sensor area. The JD 2100 M has the lighter body. The JD 2100 M and JD 2100 z3 S have the same effective resolution. The JD 2100 M and JD 2100 z3 S were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose JD 2100 M

Released in 2002, JD 2100 M has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 256 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose JD 2100 z3 S

Released in 2002, JD 2100 z3 S has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 330 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras