Reasons to choose JD 2100 F
Released in 2002, JD 2100 F has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 2100 F
vs Jenoptik JD 2100 M
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
JD 2100 F21 mm²
JD 2100 M- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 2100 F and JD 2100 M have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
JD 2100 FMetricJD 2100 M
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
116 gWeight256 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
2x AABattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 2100 F and JD 2100 M have the same sensor area. The JD 2100 F has the lighter body. The JD 2100 F and JD 2100 M have the same effective resolution. The JD 2100 F and JD 2100 M were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD 2100 M
Released in 2002, JD 2100 M has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 256 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.