CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP R607 Harajuku
vs Leica D-LUX

Archive illustration for HP R607 Harajuku

HP / 2005

R607 Harajuku

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica D-LUX

Leica / 2003

D-LUX

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
R607 Harajuku
25 mm²
D-LUX
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The R607 Harajuku and D-LUX have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

R607 HarajukuMetricD-LUX
4 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.49 µmPixel pitch2.79 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area7.76 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density12.88 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
157 gWeight204 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The R607 Harajuku and D-LUX have the same sensor area. The R607 Harajuku has the lighter body. The R607 Harajuku has the higher effective resolution. The R607 Harajuku is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose R607 Harajuku

Released in 2005, R607 Harajuku has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 157 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-LUX

Released in 2003, D-LUX has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 204 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras