CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart R507
vs HP Photosmart R707

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R507

HP / 2004

Photosmart R507

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R707

HP / 2004

Photosmart R707

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart R507
38 mm²
Photosmart R707
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The Photosmart R707 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Photosmart R507MetricPhotosmart R707
4.2 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.43 µmPixel pitch2.73 µm
5.91 µm²Pixel area7.43 µm²
16.91 MP/cm²Pixel density13.46 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
132 gWeight208 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
HP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion batteryBatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart R707 has the larger sensor area. The Photosmart R507 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R707 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart R507 and Photosmart R707 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R507

Released in 2004, Photosmart R507 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 132 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R707

Released in 2004, Photosmart R707 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 208 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras