CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart Mz67
vs Olympus Stylus 800

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart Mz67

HP / 2007

Photosmart Mz67

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus Stylus 800

Olympus / 2005

Stylus 800

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Photosmart Mz67
38 mm²
Stylus 800
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart Mz67 and Stylus 800 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Photosmart Mz67MetricStylus 800
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
227 gWeight200 g
Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart Mz67 and Stylus 800 have the same sensor area. The Stylus 800 has the lighter body. The Photosmart Mz67 and Stylus 800 have the same effective resolution. The Photosmart Mz67 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart Mz67

Released in 2007, Photosmart Mz67 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Stylus 800

Released in 2005, Stylus 800 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras