Reasons to choose Photosmart Mz67
Released in 2007, Photosmart Mz67 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart Mz67
vs Kodak EasyShare Z760
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Photosmart Mz6738 mm²
EasyShare Z760- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart Mz67 and EasyShare Z760 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart Mz67MetricEasyShare Z760
8 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
227 gWeight259 g
Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart Mz67 and EasyShare Z760 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart Mz67 has the lighter body. The Photosmart Mz67 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart Mz67 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z760
Released in 2005, EasyShare Z760 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 259 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.