Reasons to choose Photosmart Mz67
Released in 2007, Photosmart Mz67 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart Mz67
vs Kodak EasyShare C310
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Photosmart Mz6738 mm²
EasyShare C310- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart Mz67 and EasyShare C310 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart Mz67MetricEasyShare C310
8 MPEffective pixels4 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch3.08 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area9.47 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density10.56 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
227 gWeight154 g
Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart Mz67 and EasyShare C310 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare C310 has the lighter body. The Photosmart Mz67 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart Mz67 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare C310
Released in 2005, EasyShare C310 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 154 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.