Reasons to choose Photosmart M737
Released in 2007, Photosmart M737 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart M737
vs HP Photosmart R937
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Photosmart M73725 mm²
Photosmart R937- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart M737 and Photosmart R937 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Photosmart M737MetricPhotosmart R937
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight227 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart M737 and Photosmart R937 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart M737 has the lighter body. The Photosmart M737 and Photosmart R937 have the same effective resolution. The Photosmart M737 and Photosmart R937 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart R937
Released in 2007, Photosmart R937 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.