CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart M637
vs HP Photosmart R937

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart M637

HP / 2007

Photosmart M637

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R937

HP / 2007

Photosmart R937

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart M637
25 mm²
Photosmart R937
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart R937 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart M637MetricPhotosmart R937
7.2 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.45 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
28.99 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight227 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart R937 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart M637 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R937 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart R937 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart M637

Released in 2007, Photosmart M637 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R937

Released in 2007, Photosmart R937 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras