Reasons to choose Photosmart M637
Released in 2007, Photosmart M637 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart M637
vs HP Photosmart M737
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Photosmart M63725 mm²
Photosmart M737- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart M737 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Photosmart M637MetricPhotosmart M737
7.2 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.86 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.45 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
28.99 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart M737 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart M737 have the same body weight. The Photosmart M737 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart M637 and Photosmart M737 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart M737
Released in 2007, Photosmart M737 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.