CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart M627
vs HP Photosmart R725

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart M627

HP / 2006

Photosmart M627

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R725

HP / 2006

Photosmart R725

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart M627
25 mm²
Photosmart R725
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart M627 and Photosmart R725 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart M627MetricPhotosmart R725
7 MPEffective pixels6.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.88 µmPixel pitch2 µm
3.55 µm²Pixel area4.01 µm²
28.18 MP/cm²Pixel density24.96 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart M627 and Photosmart R725 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart M627 has the lighter body. The Photosmart M627 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart M627 and Photosmart R725 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart M627

Released in 2006, Photosmart M627 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R725

Released in 2006, Photosmart R725 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras