CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart M525
vs HP Photosmart R727

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart M525

HP / 2006

Photosmart M525

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R727

HP / 2006

Photosmart R727

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart M525
25 mm²
Photosmart R727
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart M525 and Photosmart R727 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart M525MetricPhotosmart R727
6 MPEffective pixels6.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch2 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area4.01 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density24.96 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
139 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart M525 and Photosmart R727 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart R727 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R727 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart M525 and Photosmart R727 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart M525

Released in 2006, Photosmart M525 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 139 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R727

Released in 2006, Photosmart R727 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras