CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart M407
vs HP Photosmart R507

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart M407

HP / 2004

Photosmart M407

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R507

HP / 2004

Photosmart R507

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart M407
25 mm²
Photosmart R507
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart M407 and Photosmart R507 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart M407MetricPhotosmart R507
4.1 MPEffective pixels4.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.46 µmPixel pitch2.43 µm
6.06 µm²Pixel area5.91 µm²
16.51 MP/cm²Pixel density16.91 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight132 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart M407 and Photosmart R507 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart R507 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R507 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart M407 and Photosmart R507 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart M407

Released in 2004, Photosmart M407 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R507

Released in 2004, Photosmart R507 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 132 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras