CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart M23
vs Leica D-LUX

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart M23

HP / 2005

Photosmart M23

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica D-LUX

Leica / 2003

D-LUX

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart M23
25 mm²
D-LUX
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart M23 and D-LUX have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Photosmart M23MetricD-LUX
4 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.49 µmPixel pitch2.79 µm
6.21 µm²Pixel area7.76 µm²
16.1 MP/cm²Pixel density12.88 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight204 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart M23 and D-LUX have the same sensor area. The Photosmart M23 has the lighter body. The Photosmart M23 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart M23 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart M23

Released in 2005, Photosmart M23 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-LUX

Released in 2003, D-LUX has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 204 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras