CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart E317
vs HP R607 BMW

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart E317

HP / 2005

Photosmart E317

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP R607 BMW

HP / 2005

R607 BMW

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart E317
25 mm²
R607 BMW
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart E317 and R607 BMW have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart E317MetricR607 BMW
5.1 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.21 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
4.87 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
20.53 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight132 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart E317 and R607 BMW have the same sensor area. The R607 BMW has the lighter body. The Photosmart E317 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart E317 and R607 BMW were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart E317

Released in 2005, Photosmart E317 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose R607 BMW

Released in 2005, R607 BMW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 132 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras