CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart E317
vs HP Photosmart M23

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart E317

HP / 2005

Photosmart E317

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart M23

HP / 2005

Photosmart M23

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Photosmart E317
25 mm²
Photosmart M23
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart E317 and Photosmart M23 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart E317MetricPhotosmart M23
5.1 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.21 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
4.87 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
20.53 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
150 gWeight120 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart E317 and Photosmart M23 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart M23 has the lighter body. The Photosmart E317 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart E317 and Photosmart M23 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart E317

Released in 2005, Photosmart E317 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart M23

Released in 2005, Photosmart M23 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras