CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart C20
vs HP Photosmart C30

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart C20

HP / 1998

Photosmart C20

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart C30

HP / 1998

Photosmart C30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
Photosmart C20
58 mm²
Photosmart C30
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart C20 and Photosmart C30 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart C20MetricPhotosmart C30
1 MPEffective pixels1 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
7.62 µmPixel pitch7.62 µm
58.08 µm²Pixel area58.08 µm²
1.72 MP/cm²Pixel density1.72 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight300 g
Compact FlashStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart C20 and Photosmart C30 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart C20 and Photosmart C30 have the same body weight. The Photosmart C20 and Photosmart C30 have the same effective resolution. The Photosmart C20 and Photosmart C30 were both released in 1998. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart C20

Released in 1998, Photosmart C20 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart C30

Released in 1998, Photosmart C30 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras