Reasons to choose Photosmart 935
Released in 2003, Photosmart 935 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.24 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart 935
vs HP Photosmart R707
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Photosmart 93538 mm²
Photosmart R707- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart 935 and Photosmart R707 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart 935MetricPhotosmart R707
5.24 MPEffective pixels5.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.69 µmPixel pitch2.73 µm
7.23 µm²Pixel area7.43 µm²
13.83 MP/cm²Pixel density13.46 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight208 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryHP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart 935 and Photosmart R707 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart R707 has the lighter body. The Photosmart 935 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart R707 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart R707
Released in 2004, Photosmart R707 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.1 MP effective resolution, and a 208 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.