Reasons to choose Photosmart 733
Released in 2004, Photosmart 733 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 289 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
HP Photosmart 733
vs HP Photosmart 735
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
Photosmart 73321 mm²
Photosmart 735- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Photosmart 733 and Photosmart 735 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Photosmart 733MetricPhotosmart 735
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.53 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area6.38 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density15.67 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
289 gWeight290 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Photosmart 733 and Photosmart 735 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart 733 has the lighter body. The Photosmart 735 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart 733 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Photosmart 735
Released in 2003, Photosmart 735 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 290 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.