CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart 612
vs HP Photosmart C215

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart 612

HP / 2001

Photosmart 612

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart C215

HP / 2000

Photosmart C215

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Photosmart 612
21 mm²
Photosmart C215
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart 612 and Photosmart C215 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Photosmart 612MetricPhotosmart C215
2.3 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.04 µmPixel pitch4.05 µm
9.27 µm²Pixel area16.4 µm²
10.79 MP/cm²Pixel density6.1 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
227 gWeight350 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart 612 and Photosmart C215 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart 612 has the lighter body. The Photosmart 612 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart 612 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart 612

Released in 2001, Photosmart 612 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 227 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart C215

Released in 2000, Photosmart C215 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras