CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP CB350
vs HP SB360

Archive illustration for HP CB350

HP / 2009

CB350

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP SB360

HP / 2009

SB360

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
CB350
28 mm²
SB360
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CB350 and SB360 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CB350MetricSB360
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.53 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
2.33 µm²Pixel area2.33 µm²
42.87 MP/cm²Pixel density42.87 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—Battery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CB350 and SB360 have the same sensor area. The CB350 and SB360 have the same body weight. The CB350 and SB360 have the same effective resolution. The CB350 and SB360 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CB350

Released in 2009, CB350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SB360

Released in 2009, SB360 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras