CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP CB350
vs HP CW450

Archive illustration for HP CB350

HP / 2009

CB350

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP CW450

HP / 2010

CW450

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
CB350
28 mm²
CW450
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CB350 and CW450 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CB350MetricCW450
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.53 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.33 µm²Pixel area2.28 µm²
42.87 MP/cm²Pixel density43.92 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—Battery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CB350 and CW450 have the same sensor area. The CB350 has the lighter body. The CW450 has the higher effective resolution. The CW450 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CB350

Released in 2009, CB350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose CW450

Released in 2010, CW450 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.5 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras