CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP CA350
vs HP PW550

Archive illustration for HP CA350

HP / 2009

CA350

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP PW550

HP / 2010

PW550

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
CA350
28 mm²
PW550
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CA350 and PW550 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CA350MetricPW550
10 MPEffective pixels12.4 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.3 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density43.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CA350 and PW550 have the same sensor area. The CA350 has the lighter body. The PW550 has the higher effective resolution. The PW550 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CA350

Released in 2009, CA350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PW550

Released in 2010, PW550 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.4 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras