Reasons to choose E1410SW
Released in 2012, E1410SW has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
GE E1410SW
vs GE X600
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
E1410SW28 mm²
X600- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E1410SW and X600 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
E1410SWMetricX600
14.4 MPEffective pixels14.41 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.97 µm²
50.6 MP/cm²Pixel density50.63 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E1410SW and X600 have the same sensor area. The E1410SW and X600 have the same body weight. The X600 has the higher effective resolution. The E1410SW and X600 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X600
Released in 2012, X600 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.41 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.