CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE E1050
vs GE E1055 W

Archive illustration for GE E1050

GE / 2008

E1050

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for GE E1055 W

GE / 2008

E1055 W

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
E1050
28 mm²
E1055 W
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The E1050 and E1055 W have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

E1050MetricE1055 W
10.7 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.61 µmPixel pitch1.66 µm
2.59 µm²Pixel area2.75 µm²
38.59 MP/cm²Pixel density36.43 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The E1050 and E1055 W have the same sensor area. The E1055 W has the lighter body. The E1050 has the higher effective resolution. The E1050 and E1055 W were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose E1050

Released in 2008, E1050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.7 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E1055 W

Released in 2008, E1055 W has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras