Reasons to choose C1440W
Released in 2012, C1440W has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
GE C1440W
vs GE E1410SW
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
C1440W28 mm²
E1410SW- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The C1440W and E1410SW have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
C1440WMetricE1410SW
14.1 MPEffective pixels14.4 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.42 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
2.02 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
49.54 MP/cm²Pixel density50.6 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
—StorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The C1440W and E1410SW have the same sensor area. The C1440W and E1410SW have the same body weight. The E1410SW has the higher effective resolution. The C1440W and E1410SW were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E1410SW
Released in 2012, E1410SW has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.