CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE C1433
vs GE E1680W

Archive illustration for GE C1433

GE / 2011

C1433

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for GE E1680W

GE / 2011

E1680W

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
C1433
28 mm²
E1680W
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The C1433 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

C1433MetricE1680W
14.4 MPEffective pixels16.5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.3 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.68 µm²
50.6 MP/cm²Pixel density59.51 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight135 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C1433 has the larger sensor area. The C1433 has the lighter body. The E1680W has the higher effective resolution. The C1433 and E1680W were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C1433

Released in 2011, C1433 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.4 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E1680W

Released in 2011, E1680W has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.5 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras