CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE A1235
vs GE E1276W

Archive illustration for GE A1235

GE / 2009

A1235

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for GE E1276W

GE / 2009

E1276W

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
A1235
28 mm²
E1276W
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The A1235 and E1276W have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

A1235MetricE1276W
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.53 µmPixel pitch1.53 µm
2.33 µm²Pixel area2.33 µm²
42.87 MP/cm²Pixel density42.87 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight160 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The A1235 and E1276W have the same sensor area. The A1235 has the lighter body. The A1235 and E1276W have the same effective resolution. The A1235 and E1276W were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose A1235

Released in 2009, A1235 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E1276W

Released in 2009, E1276W has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras