CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE A1035
vs GE A1050

Archive illustration for GE A1035

GE / 2009

A1035

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for GE A1050

GE / 2009

A1050

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
A1035
28 mm²
A1050
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The A1035 and A1050 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

A1035MetricA1050
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.66 µmPixel pitch1.66 µm
2.75 µm²Pixel area2.75 µm²
36.43 MP/cm²Pixel density36.43 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight145 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The A1035 and A1050 have the same sensor area. The A1035 and A1050 have the same body weight. The A1035 and A1050 have the same effective resolution. The A1035 and A1050 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose A1035

Released in 2009, A1035 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose A1050

Released in 2009, A1050 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras