CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

GE A1030
vs GE E1040

Archive illustration for GE A1030

GE / 2008

A1030

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for GE E1040

GE / 2007

E1040

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
A1030
42 mm²
E1040
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The A1030 and E1040 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

A1030MetricE1040
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.54 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
2.05 µmPixel pitch2.01 µm
4.2 µm²Pixel area4.03 µm²
23.78 MP/cm²Pixel density24.82 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
—Weight150 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The A1030 and E1040 have the same sensor area. The A1030 has the lighter body. The E1040 has the higher effective resolution. The A1030 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose A1030

Released in 2008, A1030 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose E1040

Released in 2007, E1040 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.54 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras