CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Fujifilm X-T30 III
vs Ricoh GR IV

Archive illustration for Fujifilm X-T30 III

Fujifilm / 2025

X-T30 III

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh GR IV

Ricoh / 2025

GR IV

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

367 mm²
X-T30 III
361 mm²
GR IV
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
1.5%

The X-T30 III has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

X-T30 IIIMetricGR IV
26.1 MPEffective pixels25.7 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.3 × 15.5
3.75 µmPixel pitch3.75 µm
14.05 µm²Pixel area14.05 µm²
7.12 MP/cm²Pixel density7.12 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.55
6,240 × 4,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080 / 60p
378 gWeight262 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I)StorageSD UHS-I / Internal storage
NP-W126S Li-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryDB-120 Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The X-T30 III has the larger sensor area. The GR IV has the lighter body. The X-T30 III has the higher effective resolution. The X-T30 III and GR IV were both released in 2025. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose X-T30 III

Released in 2025, X-T30 III has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 378 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GR IV

Released in 2025, GR IV has about 361 mm² of sensor area, 25.7 MP effective resolution, and a 262 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras