Reasons to choose X-T30 II
Released in 2021, X-T30 II has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 383 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-T30 II
vs Ricoh GR IIIx
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
X-T30 II367 mm²
GR IIIx- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The X-T30 II and GR IIIx have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
X-T30 IIMetricGR IIIx
26.1 MPEffective pixels24.24 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.75 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
14.05 µm²Pixel area15.12 µm²
7.12 MP/cm²Pixel density6.61 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
383 gWeight262 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryDB-110 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-T30 II and GR IIIx have the same sensor area. The GR IIIx has the lighter body. The X-T30 II has the higher effective resolution. The X-T30 II and GR IIIx were both released in 2021. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GR IIIx
Released in 2021, GR IIIx has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.24 MP effective resolution, and a 262 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.