Reasons to choose X-T10
Released in 2015, X-T10 has about 368 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 381 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-T10
vs Nikon Df
VS
Sensor area
368 mm²
X-T10860 mm²
Df- Area ratio
- 2.34:1
- Absolute difference
- 492 mm²
- Relative difference
- 133.7%
The Df has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
X-T10MetricDf
16.3 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
23.6 × 15.6Sensor36 × 23.9
4.75 µmPixel pitch7.29 µm
22.59 µm²Pixel area53.11 µm²
4.43 MP/cm²Pixel density1.88 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video—
381 gWeight765 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I)StorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126 Li-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryEN-EL14a Rechargeable Li-ion Battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Df has the larger sensor area. The X-T10 has the lighter body. The X-T10 has the higher effective resolution. The X-T10 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Df
Released in 2013, Df has about 860 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 765 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.