CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Fujifilm MX-1200
vs Fujifilm MX-600 Zoom

Archive illustration for Fujifilm MX-1200

Fujifilm / 1999

MX-1200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Fujifilm MX-600 Zoom

Fujifilm / 1999

MX-600 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
MX-1200
31 mm²
MX-600 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The MX-1200 and MX-600 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

MX-1200MetricMX-600 Zoom
1.2 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
5.06 µmPixel pitch4.86 µm
25.6 µm²Pixel area23.63 µm²
3.91 MP/cm²Pixel density4.23 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
240 gWeight385 g
SmartMediaStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (2) batteries (supplied)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The MX-1200 and MX-600 Zoom have the same sensor area. The MX-1200 has the lighter body. The MX-600 Zoom has the higher effective resolution. The MX-1200 and MX-600 Zoom were both released in 1999. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose MX-1200

Released in 1999, MX-1200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose MX-600 Zoom

Released in 1999, MX-600 Zoom has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 385 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras